Mechanics and Strength of Materials

Strength of Materials: Stress, Strain, and Structural Performance

Tensile Testing and Mechanical Property Evaluation for Structural Design


Assignment Grade: 3.1 / 3.5
Subject Details
  • Professor: Fabio Morais
  • Submitted: June 2024
  • Subject Grade: 7.4 / 10
Key Learning Outcomes
  • Conducting tensile tests and analyzing material behavior
  • Constructing and interpreting stress-strain graphs
  • Identifying yield, ultimate, and rupture stress
  • Calculating the modulus of elasticity and comparing material properties
  • Applying mechanical principles to structural design and material selection

Case Study Overview

Objective

Analyze the mechanical properties of materials used in engineering applications by conducting tensile tests. Construct stress-strain graphs to determine key properties such as yield stress, ultimate stress, rupture stress, and modulus of elasticity. Compare different materials, including A36 carbon steel, 6AI-4V titanium alloy, and 6061 aluminum alloy, to assess their suitability for structural applications. Use the results to validate the design of a metal structure and support material selection decisions.

Challenge

The primary challenge in this analysis lies in ensuring accurate and consistent tensile testing across different materials, each with unique characteristics. Specific difficulties include maintaining precise strain measurements to within ±0.001 mm/mm, controlling the testing velocity to accurately detect the yield point, and ensuring proper specimen alignment to prevent eccentric loading during the test. Further complexity arises from differentiating between ductile and brittle fracture mechanisms, accurately calculating true stress-strain values versus engineering values, and accounting for necking effects when determining ultimate strength. Additional hurdles come from comparing materials with varying work-hardening behaviors and fracture characteristics, which complicates the analysis and interpretation of results.

Context

You have been hired by a design company that performs structural calculations for various applications. One of the tasks proposed in your new role is to validate the design of a metal structure used in events, and for this, you initially need to evaluate the mechanical properties of some types of materials to select the most suitable for such an application.

To perform this evaluation, you can conduct some tests on the materials, one of which is the tensile test.

Step 1

Initially, you analyzed the results of a test conducted by one of the suppliers. In the test, a steel specimen was used, with a diameter of 12.6 mm and a gauge length of 51 mm, which was subjected to a tensile test until rupture. The load and elongation data obtained during the test are shown in Table 1.

Table 1
  1. Based on the results provided in Table 1, CONSTRUCT the stress-strain graph to identify each of the following items. EXPLAIN how you reached this conclusion for each item.
    1. The yield stress;
    2. The ultimate stress;
    3. The rupture stress.

    The normal stress is calculated by the following expression:

    \[ \sigma = \frac{F}{A} \]

    Additionally, the strain is obtained from the following expression:

    \[ \epsilon = \frac{|L_i - L_0|}{L_0} = \frac{\delta_0}{L_0} \]

    According to the problem statement, the following values of strain and normal stress were obtained:

    Load (kN) δ (mm) Strain (mm/mm) Stress (MPa)
    0 0 0.0000 0.000
    10.6 0.018 0.0004 85.011
    23.1 0.0395 0.0008 185.260
    34.1 0.0585 0.0011 273.479
    45.7 0.079 0.0015 366.509
    56.2 0.098 0.0019 450.718
    63.1 0.111 0.0022 506.056
    64.2 0.117 0.0023 514.878
    66.5 0.133 0.0026 533.323
    74.1 0.172 0.0034 594.275
    82.9 0.2 0.0039 664.850
    88.2 0.3 0.0059 707.355
    92.6 0.4 0.0078 742.643
    97.2 0.6 0.0118 779.534
    98.1 0.8 0.0157 786.752
    97.7 1.5 0.0294 783.544
    96.7 3 0.0588 775.524
    93.9 5 0.0980 753.069
    89.1 7 0.1373 714.573
    81.5 9 0.1765 653.622
    74.3 11 0.2157 595.879

    Therefore, I present the stress-strain diagram below:

    Stress-Strain Diagram

    Analyzing the graph, the following observations are made:

    1. Yield Stress: Characterized by the beginning of the plastic region. Its value is approximately 707.355 MPa.
    2. Ultimate Stress: Defined as the highest stress reached by the material in the plastic zone. The increase in stress is caused by the reduction in the cross-sectional area of the material. The value of this stress is approximately 786.752 MPa.
    3. Rupture Stress: Expressed by the stress at the moment of rupture of the specimen. Its value is approximately 595.879 MPa.
    4. Proportional Limit: Defined by the point where the diagram ceases to exhibit linear behavior. Its value is approximately 506.056 MPa.
  2. Detrmine the modulus of elasticity of this material.
  3. Taking two points from the linear elastic region of the graph from the previous item, the modulus of elasticity is approximately:

    \[ E = \frac{(\sigma_f - \sigma_0)}{(\epsilon_f - \epsilon_0)} \\ E = \frac{(273.479 - 185.260)}{(0.0011 - 0.0008)} \\ E = \frac{115.219}{0.0003} \\ E = 384063.3333 \, \text{MPa} \\ E = 384.063 \, \text{GPa} \]

Step 2

After evaluating the results, you decided to conduct tests with new materials from three other suppliers to compare the results. Each supplier provided a different material: A36 carbon steel, 6AI-4V titanium alloy, and 6061 aluminum alloy. In this case, you must perform the test for each material and evaluate some of their properties. List the results in the tables below:

Tables for materials

Using the Algetec virtual laboratory, I performed the tensile test for the three materials described above, as shown below.

Below are the measurements of the specimens for each material:

A36 Steel

The A36 steel specimen was measured, and the following values were observed:

\[ D_0 = 5.25 \, \text{mm} \\ L_0 = 36.15 \, \text{mm} \]
Dimensions of the A36 Steel Specimen
Figure 1: Dimensions of the Test Sample Steel A36
6AI-4V Steel

The 6AI-4V steel specimen was measured, and the following values were observed:

\[ D_0 = 5.50 \, \text{mm} \\ L_0 = 36.60 \, \text{mm} \]
Dimensions of the 6AI-4V Steel Specimen
Figure 2: Dimensions of the Test Sample Steel 6AI-4V
6061 Steel

The 6061 steel specimen was measured, and the following values were observed:

\[ D_0 = 5.20 \, \text{mm} \\ L_0 = 36.05 \, \text{mm} \]
Dimensions of the 6061 Steel Specimen
Figure 3: Dimensions of the Test Sample Steel 6061

The following methodology was used to perform the test:

  1. The specimen was inserted into the machine and fixed in the grips, as shown below.
  2. Specimen Fixation in the Machine
    Figure 4: Securing the Test Sample in the Machine
  3. Calibration of the dial indicator. This instrument measures the elongation of the specimen during the test.
  4. Dial Indicator Calibration
    Figure 5: Dial Gauge Calibration
  5. Activation of the manual pump to apply the load to the system and start the test. At each pump activation, the load and its corresponding elongation were recorded until rupture was achieved.
  6. Manual Pump
    Figure 6: Manual Pump

Note that a pre-load was applied to calibrate the system, and the dial indicator was reset to start the test.

Sample A36 6AI-4V 6061
L (mm) 36.15 36.60 36.05
Φ (mm) 5.25 5.50 5.20
Reading ∆L (mm) Load (kgf/cm²) ∆L (mm) Load (kgf/cm²) ∆L (mm) Load (kgf/cm²)
1 0.435 0.450 0.450 19 0.010 10
2 0.450 0.480 0.480 55 0.019 17
3 0.458 0.510 0.510 85 0.019 19
4 0.470 0.550 0.550 125 0.022 23
5 0.800 0.570 0.570 145 0.030 33
6 0.980 0.590 0.590 165 0.040 39
7 1.160 0.610 0.610 189 0.045 45
8 1.340 0.635 0.635 210 0.050 52
9 1.52 0.66 0.66 230 0.06 60
10 1.7 0.71 0.71 270 0.07 65
11 1.89 0.74 0.74 283 0.08 73
12 2.07 0.755 0.755 291 0.09 85
13 2.24 0.78 0.78 300 0.092 91
14 2.425 0.82 0.82 310 0.1 93
15 2.61 0.82 0.82 311.000 0.13 93.000
16 2.79 0.88 0.88 313.000 0.13 95.000
17 3.15 1.01 1.01 314.000 0.18 98.000
18 3.7 1.115 1.115 315.000 0.35 100.000
19 4.42 1.26 1.26 316.000 0.53 102.000
20 4.6 1.465 1.465 316.000 0.72 103.000
21 4.79 1.71 1.71 317 0.91 104
22 4.98 1.98 1.98 318 1.09 105
23 5.15 2.32 2.32 319 1.26 106
24 5.33 2.70 2.70 319 1.44 106
25 5.51 3.11 3.11 320 1.63 107
26 4.8 4.8 321 1.81 106
27 4.22 4.22 321 1.99 105
28 4.48 4.48 321 2.17 104
29 4.71 4.71 319 2.34 103
30 5.07 5.07 315 2.53 102
31 5.32 5.32 310 2.71 198
32 5.75 5.75 295
33 5.84 5.84 292
34 5.90 5.90 287
35 5.95 5.95 283
36 5.97 5.97 279
37 5.99 5.99 275
38 6.01 6.01 270
39 6.02 6.02 265
40 6.03 6.03 262

Step 3

Based on the results obtained, determine the stress-strain curve for the three materials and discuss the evaluated properties and the behavior of each tested material.

When performing the experiment, it was observed that the pump load is given in kgf/cm². Thus, this value was multiplied by the piston area (6.5 cm²) to obtain the load in kgf. Then, this load was converted to Newtons using the relation:

\[ 1 \, \text{kgf} = 9.8067 \, \text{N} \]

Finally, the tensile stress was calculated using the expression:

\[ \sigma = \frac{\text{Load (N)}}{\text{Cross-sectional area of the specimen (mm}^2)} \]

Resulting in the following:

Stress-Strain Diagram for A36 Steel

Stress-Strain Diagram for 6AI-4V Steel

Stress-Strain Diagram for 6061 Steel

Analyzing the diagrams above, it can be concluded that the 6061 steel exhibits brittle behavior, as it does not undergo significant deformation before rupture. On the other hand, the A36 and 6AI-4V steels are ductile materials, deforming significantly before rupture.

Additionally, the rupture stress for each material can be identified:

\[ \sigma_{\text{rupture-A36}} = 341.57 \, \text{MPa} \\ \sigma_{\text{rupture-6AI-4V}} = 702.95 \, \text{MPa} \\ \sigma_{\text{rupture-6061}} = 294.15 \, \text{MPa} \]

The 6AI-4V steel exhibited the highest value among the three materials.

The yield stress of the steels also showed distinct values:

\[ \sigma_{\text{yield-A36}} \approx 259 \, \text{MPa} \\ \sigma_{\text{yield-6AI-4V}} \approx 830 \, \text{MPa} \\ \sigma_{\text{yield-6061}} \approx 289 \, \text{MPa} \]

Thus, it is concluded that the 6AI-4V steel has a more pronounced elastic zone, as yielding in this material begins at stresses around 830 MPa, while the other materials exhibit plastic behavior at stresses around 259 MPa and 289 MPa.

The experiment indicated that among the options, the 6AI-4V steel is the material that withstands the highest stresses. This statement can be proven by observing the ultimate stress values:

\[ \sigma_{\text{ultimate-A36}} = 409.30 \, \text{MPa} \\ \sigma_{\text{ultimate-6AI-4V}} = 861.24 \, \text{MPa} \\ \sigma_{\text{ultimate-6061}} = 321.16 \, \text{MPa} \]

Analyzing the modulus of elasticity for each material, the following values were observed:

\[ E_{\text{A36}} = \frac{206.12 - 170.79}{0.012669 - 0.012448} = 159864.25 \, \text{MPa} \\ E_{\text{6AI-4V}} = \frac{563.43 - 507.09}{0.017350 - 0.016667} = 82489.02 \, \text{MPa} \\ E_{\text{6061}} = \frac{180.09 - 156.08}{0.001664 - 0.001387} = 86678.70 \, \text{MPa} \]

Therefore, it is concluded that the A36 steel has the highest modulus of elasticity and, consequently, is the stiffest steel among all the materials studied.

Key Findings & Engineering Implications

Material Performance Analysis
  • Ti-6Al-4V showed superior UTS: 861 MPa
  • A36 steel exhibited highest modulus: 159.8 GPa
  • Al-6061 demonstrated brittle fracture behavior
  • 6Al-4V had 142% higher yield strength than A36
  • Al-6061 showed 62% lower rupture stress vs Ti alloy
  • Clear necking observed in steel specimens only
Structural Design Recommendations
  • Ti-6Al-4V optimal for high-stress aerospace applications
  • A36 steel suitable for stiffness-critical structures
  • Al-6061 appropriate for non-critical lightweight components
Experimental Validation: The 214% difference in modulus between steel and aluminum explains their different applications in structural engineering, while titanium's balanced properties justify its use in medical implants.